Bioaugmentation demonstrates similar outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair compared to revision without bioaugmentation.

There was a weak trend toward larger tear size in patients who failed (19.3 ± 12.5 mm vs. 11.4 ± 9.1 mm, P = .085) but this was not statistically significant and may be limited by the small sample size of the present study.

also in 220 other papers