highly significantp < 0.01
The results presented in Table 2 indicate a highly significant implicit effect of the evaluative IAT test ( t = −18.02, df = 102, p < 0.01).
The results presented in Table 2 indicate a highly significant implicit effect of the evaluative IAT test ( t = −18.02, df = 102, p < 0.01).
The ANOVA results showed (see Table 4 ) that the main effect of exercise level was significant, F (1, 99) = 30.16, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.23; the main effect of gender was marginally significant, F (1, 99) = 3.34, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.03; the interaction between exercise level and gender was not significant, F (1, 99) = 0.12, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.02.