Furthermore, with the addition of NCCT signs, including the black hole sign and BAT score≥3 in Model 2, there was a notable trend towards further improvement in predictive capability, although the difference was not statistically significant.
← all excerpts
Predicting Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion with Inflammation Indices, Non-Contrast Computed Tomography Signs and Computed Tomography Angiography Spot Sign.
2
—
—
The sentences
In Model 2, four factors (NLR, baseline hematoma volume, BAT score≥3, and black hole sign) showed an increasing trend in prediction (Model 2 AUC, 0.875 [95% CI, 0.822–0.929]), but the improvement compared to Model 1 was not statistically significant (the AUCs of Model 2 vs Model 1, p = 0.089, Delong test).