Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Human-Wildlife Conflict in Bardia-Banke Complex: Patterns of Human Fatalities and Injuries Caused by Large Mammals.

Ecol Evol · 2024 · PMC11461565 · PMID 39385838

3
hedged sentences
0.0500
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0500
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.05actually significant
The distance to the forest area and park boundary is highly significant to the conflict cases ( χ 2 = 88.842, df = 2, p < 0.05), as 84% of cases were recorded nearer the national park, with the distance less than 1 km (Figure 6 ). 4 Causes for the Conflict Grass collection and cattle grazing were the major underlying factors leading to the conflict with wild animals (Figure 7 ), with 21 cases reported ( χ 2 = 113.74, df = 13, p < 0.05).

also in 132,142 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
6 Conservation Implications Human–wildlife conflict is on an increasing trend, and most of the conflict cases in the BBC occurred in forests, mainly when people enter forests to collect forest resources.

also in 63,971 other papers

a decreasing trendno p-value reported
Bardia—Banke Complex human–wildlife conflict large mammals spatial and temporal patterns 3.2 Temporal Pattern of Human Injuries and Fatalities The wildlife attack on humans seems to be in a decreasing trend.

also in 47,180 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.