approached significantp = .08
Moreover, this congruency effect for aligned composites was larger than for misaligned composites for both top and bottom targets, as indicated by the significant interaction between Congruency and Alignment in d′ , top: β = 1.00, 95% CI [0.73, 1.27], z = 7.29, p < .001, bottom: β = 0.28, 95% CI [0.02, 0.53], z = 2.13, p = .03, although the same interactions were not but approached significant in RT: top: β = −32.6, 95% CI [−69.6, 4.4], z = −1.73, p = .08, bottom: β = −41.2, 95% CI [−82.6, 0.1], z = −1.95; p = .0507.