highly significantp<0.0001
Females with low HDL (61.02%, n=72) were in a larger proportion compared to males (38.98%, n=46), and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001) (Table 2 ).
Females with low HDL (61.02%, n=72) were in a larger proportion compared to males (38.98%, n=46), and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001) (Table 2 ).