While reproducing the decrease in average epigenetic age, this clock demonstrates no statistically significant difference between the days 0 and 15 of in vitro reprogramming in one dataset (Ohnuki et al., 2014 ) (Figure 5c ), and marginal significance between days 0 and 17 in another dataset (Gill et al., 2022 ) (Figure 5d ).
← all excerpts
Epistemic uncertainty challenges aging clock reliability in predicting rejuvenation effects.
1
—
—