Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Metacontrast masking does not change with different display technologies: A comparison of CRT and LCD monitors.

Behav Res Methods · 2024 · PMC11685275 · PMID 39739150

1
hedged sentence
0.0510
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0510
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The difference in average sensitivity between CRT ( M = 1.45, SD = 1.14) and LCD ( M = 1.76, SD = 1.1) was again small, but we observed a marginally significant main effect of display type, F (1, 23) = 4.24, p = 0.051, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{G}^{2}$$\end{document} η G 2 = 0.014, indicating better performance on LCD.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.