highly significantp = 0.003
The fitted model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.14, F (2, 61) = 6.39, p = 0.003) with both sessions and incompatible groups correctly predicting the mean latency of “correct” responses.
1
0.0030
0.0030
The fitted model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.14, F (2, 61) = 6.39, p = 0.003) with both sessions and incompatible groups correctly predicting the mean latency of “correct” responses.