highly significantp < 0.001
On the other hand, the Pszczyna and Carpathian comparison showed a highly significant morphological divergence (F = 72.005, p < 0.001), with a large proportion of shape variation accounted for by the group (R2 = 0.71288).
On the other hand, the Pszczyna and Carpathian comparison showed a highly significant morphological divergence (F = 72.005, p < 0.001), with a large proportion of shape variation accounted for by the group (R2 = 0.71288).