Independent Effects of Emotional Expression and Group Membership in the Evaluative Priming Task.

Exp Psychol · 2024 · PMC11770364 · PMID 39665186

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0570

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Emotion × Group Interaction was marginally significant, F (1,87) = 3.73, p = .057, η p 2 = .041, d Z = .21. 4 The priming score for ingroup happy faces ( M = 3.15, SD = 5.70) exceeded that for Middle-Eastern happy faces ( M = 1.05, SD = 5.37, see Table 1 ), t (87) = 2.46, p = .016, whereas ingroup ( M = −0.91, SD = 5.06) and outgroup ( M = −0.88, SD = 6.32) fearful faces were comparable in terms of mean priming scores; t (87) = −0.04 , p = . 970.

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported

One might be tempted to wink at these results, given the marginal significance.

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.