Comparison of tooth substance loss and angle deviation in access cavity preparation using guided endodontics and conventional method in calcified canals - An in vitro study.

J Conserv Dent Endod · 2025 · PMC11835359 · PMID 39974687

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0010

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant

This study also showed that angle deviation in the conventional group (Group 1) was 13.16° ± 02.34 SD and in the guided method (Group 2) was 04.82° ± 01.66 SD which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 and Graph 2 ].

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.