fell short of significancep = 0.207
In this same subgroup, the correlation of BIS with months of TM was positive but fell short of significance: r (26) = 0.256, p = 0.207.
In this same subgroup, the correlation of BIS with months of TM was positive but fell short of significance: r (26) = 0.256, p = 0.207.
Comparison of N2, P3a, and P3b Latencies An omnibus MANOVA conducted with two between factors (Age Group and TM Status) and N2, P3a, and P3b latencies as variates resulted in highly significant main effects for both factors, with latencies for the Young Group (collapsing across TM Status) and the TM Group (collapsing across Age Group) being shorter.