borderline significantp = 0.047
14.5% among non-users), this association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.047 before correction, p = 0.067 after), highlighting the need for further research with larger samples.
14.5% among non-users), this association was only borderline significant ( p = 0.047 before correction, p = 0.067 after), highlighting the need for further research with larger samples.
A marginally significant relationship was found (χ 2 (1, N = 691) = 3.938, p = 0.047), though this relationship became non-significant when applying the continuity correction ( p = 0.067).
While the data suggest a trend toward higher unhealthy food consumption among walker users, the evidence for this association is relatively weak, given the borderline significance levels across different statistical tests. 3.4.