In the CG, only the BB of both sides showed an increasing trend, while the other muscles remained the same or with a decreasing trend; thus, the difference among the muscles remained highly significant ( p < 0.01) after the intervention, with the consequent slight decrease in total activity (g = 0.01) previously mentioned. 2.2.
These changes reflected a change in the pattern of basal activation among the muscles, as can be seen in Figure 2 ( Table A1 in Appendix A ), showing a more tenuous and homogeneous increase in basal activity among the muscles in the IG, with the muscles showing highly significant differences at T0 ( p < 0.01), but then became significant only after the two-month intervention ( p < 0.05), corroborating the previous result of higher total basal activation only in this group.
In the CG, only the BB of both sides showed an increasing trend, while the other muscles remained the same or with a decreasing trend; thus, the difference among the muscles remained highly significant ( p < 0.01) after the intervention, with the consequent slight decrease in total activity (g = 0.01) previously mentioned. 2.2.