highly significantP = 0.003
Comparative analyses of functional connectivity strength within the four regions of interest (ROIs) and among the six ROI pairs in the two athlete groups demonstrated highly significant differences in correlation coefficients for PFC-L ( P = 0.003, Hedges’ g = 1.48, 95% CI[0.74, 2.22]), PFC-R ( P = 0.003, Hedges’ g = 1.49, 95% CI[0.75, 2.23]), M1-R ( P = 0.003, Hedges’ g=−1.34, 95% CI[−2.07, −0.61]), PFC-L-PFC-R ( P = 0.004, Hedges’ g = 1.50, 95% CI[0.76, 2.24]), and M1-R-M1-L ( P = 0.001, Hedges’ g=−1.77, 95% CI[−2.26, −0.98]).