marginally significantp = 0.06
A significant difference in hydration increment was noted between both groups at Week 4, with the CPM‐HA20G treated side demonstrating an average hydration increment of 12.3% (95% CI 1.3–23.2, p = 0.029); there was also a marginally significant difference between the two groups at week 32, where the average hydration increment of the CPM‐HA20G treated side was 10.7% (95% CI −0.4 to 21.8, p = 0.06) higher than that of the CPM‐HA20 treated side, as shown in Figure 4 . 3.4.