borderline significantp = 0.05
In the worst-case scenario, all excluded patients were assumed to experience UNOs, yielding a borderline significant increase in UNO risk for RTS compared to LTS (RR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00–1.19; p = 0.05; I 2 = 33%; Fig.
In the worst-case scenario, all excluded patients were assumed to experience UNOs, yielding a borderline significant increase in UNO risk for RTS compared to LTS (RR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00–1.19; p = 0.05; I 2 = 33%; Fig.