marginally significantp =.056
Additionally, the decrease of SWAY(z) from Set 1 to Set 2 was marginally significant [ 52 ] ( p =.056), as well as the decrease of RANGE(y) ( p =.07).
Additionally, the decrease of SWAY(z) from Set 1 to Set 2 was marginally significant [ 52 ] ( p =.056), as well as the decrease of RANGE(y) ( p =.07).
Decrease in ApCoM VT range revealed a marginal significance in the High-Performance group ( p =.06), which also exhibited an overall tendency to decrease in the other linear variables from Set 1 to Set 2.