Biomechanical comparisons between the 8‐week capsule repair group (Group 2A) and the 8‐week cam resection + capsule repair group (Group 4 A) ( p = 0.06), as well as between the 8‐week cam resection without repair group (Group 3A) and Group 4A ( p = 0.09), demonstrated a trend toward significance, suggesting that cam excision may contribute to improved biomechanical stability. 2.
← all excerpts
Comparative effects of hip capsule repair and cam lesion excision on capsulotomy healing: An in vivo biomechanical and histological analysis.
2
—
—
The sentences
Comparisons between Group 1 and Group 3 (cam resection without repair) ( p = 0.09), Group 1A (8‐week unrepaired capsulotomy) and Group 4A (8‐week cam resection with capsule repair) ( p = 0.06), and Group 2A (8‐week capsule repair) and Group 4A ( p = 0.06) yielded p ‐values close to significance.