marginally significantp = 0.02
For the two individuals as a pair ( Fig 3B ), the proportion is lower (3.1±0.8%, p = 0.8), and the evidence against models without WHG-related ancestry is weaker (although still marginally significant; p = 0.02–0.04).
For the two individuals as a pair ( Fig 3B ), the proportion is lower (3.1±0.8%, p = 0.8), and the evidence against models without WHG-related ancestry is weaker (although still marginally significant; p = 0.02–0.04).