marginally significantp = 0.055
ving flags [χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 16.269, p < 0.001], using personification and choosing among different text-image relations [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 13.141, p = 0.001], using personification and using iconography in general [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 6.180, p = 0.046], with those instances involving people being marginally significant [ χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 3.681, p = 0.055], but still more significant than the remaining subtypes.