highly significantp <.001
The PRC index for set size 2 was highly significant, t (61) = 4.44, p <.001, d = 0.56, as well as the PRC index for set size 9, t (63) = 4.63, p <.001, d = 0.58.
The PRC index for set size 2 was highly significant, t (61) = 4.44, p <.001, d = 0.56, as well as the PRC index for set size 9, t (63) = 4.63, p <.001, d = 0.58.
The interaction of response relation and distractor relation was marginally significant, F (1, 40) = 3.68, p =.062, η p 2 = 0.08, showing that when both the response and distractor repeated, less errors were made than when only one of them repeated.
The PRC index for set size 2 was not significant, t (40) = 0.852, p =.399, d = 0.13, and set size 5 reached marginal significance, t (40) = 0.1.72, p =.092, d = 0.27, whereas the PRC index for set size 9 was significant, t (40) = 4.79, p <.001, d = 0.75.