a trend toward significanceP = 0.052
Furthermore, the difference in RPR-T between both groups had a trend toward significance (0.21 ± 0.71 (95% CI 0.01, 0.40) D vs. − 0.09 ± 0.75 (95% CI − 0.33, 0.15) D, P = 0.052).
Furthermore, the difference in RPR-T between both groups had a trend toward significance (0.21 ± 0.71 (95% CI 0.01, 0.40) D vs. − 0.09 ± 0.75 (95% CI − 0.33, 0.15) D, P = 0.052).