Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia.

Ann Dyslexia · 2025 · PMC12238137 · PMID 39946079

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, the one-way ANOVA conducted on accuracy scores revealed a marginally significant effect of group ( p = 0.06) due to fact that the doubly low group displayed the lowest accuracy and differed from both the low-accuracy and the low-rate groups.

also in 26,082 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported

The one-way ANOVA conducted on this task accuracy measure revealed a highly significant group effect, which to a great extent mimicked that of the combined measure of reading accuracy (see Table 2 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.