highly significantp = 9.3 × 10 - 4
final echo decorrelation ( r = 0.102 , RMS error 0.122, p = 0.520 ), but were highly significant for ablation rate vs. decorrelation ( r = 0.331 , RMS error 0.352 ml min −1 , p = 9.3 × 10 - 4 ).
final echo decorrelation ( r = 0.102 , RMS error 0.122, p = 0.520 ), but were highly significant for ablation rate vs. decorrelation ( r = 0.331 , RMS error 0.352 ml min −1 , p = 9.3 × 10 - 4 ).