failed to reach significancep = 0.06
The cueing effect in the narrow-focus condition marginally failed to reach significance, but there was a trend with a small effect size, t (26) = 1.96, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.38, BF = 1.06.
The cueing effect in the narrow-focus condition marginally failed to reach significance, but there was a trend with a small effect size, t (26) = 1.96, p = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.38, BF = 1.06.
There was a marginally nonsignificant effect and the trend showed that participants performed slightly better in the broad-focus condition (77.66% ± 0.02%) than they did in the split-focus condition (72.75% ± 0.02%; t (26) = 2.03, p BH = 0.13, Cohen’s d = 0.39, BF = 1.19).