Numerical differences between the two groups that just failed to reach statistical significance were observed for TVF (17.23% vs. 14.66%, p = 0.14) and MACE rates after 5 years (20.11% vs. 16.99%, p = 0.09) (Table 5 and Figs. 3 – 4 ).
← all excerpts
Absorb® bioresorbable scaffold in "established" versus "off-label" coronary lesions: 5-year data from the GABI-R® registry.
1
0.1400
0.1400