Why indecisive trials matter: Improving the binocular rivalry imagery priming score for the assessment of aphantasia.

Behav Res Methods · 2025 · PMC12321684 · PMID 40759828

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0530

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0530

boldest claim

The sentences

just missed significancep = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Within aphantasics, no significant association between VVIQ and binocular rivalry difference score was found, β = 0.078, p = 0.640, BF 01 = 2.91, R 2 = 0.006, whereas in controls, the association between VVIQ and binocular rivalry difference score just missed significance, β = 0.227, p = 0.053, BF 10 = 1.24, R 2 = 0.038.

also in 42 other papers

almost significantno p-value reported

Importantly, however, this could also be driven by variance restrictions within the groups, especially since the regression within the higher variance subgroup, that is, the control group, was almost significant.

also in 580 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.