marginally significantp = 0.08
After adjustment, the difference in PDFF remained marginally significant ( p = 0.08), possibly indicating early compositional changes associated with biomechanical factors.
After adjustment, the difference in PDFF remained marginally significant ( p = 0.08), possibly indicating early compositional changes associated with biomechanical factors.
The differences in PDFF for MF L4/5 , ES L4/5 , PM L3/4 , and PM L4/5 remained statistically significant after adjustment ( p < 0.05), while the difference in GM PDFF showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08) (Table 2 ).