Inter-rater reliability of global and analytic assessment of prosthodontic procedures.

global evaluation method for each study participant Paired sample t -testing revealed no statistically significant differences between analytic and global evaluations for each study participant, except for professor 1 for indirect provisional evaluations, where there was a marginally significant difference between the global and analytic analysis ( p = 0.04) (Table 2 ), but these were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (all p = 1.0).

also in 26,082 other papers