failed to reach significancep = .123
Though MV children's performance in receptive language was better than expressive language (i.e., 3.1 > 2.7), the difference failed to reach significance, t (25) = 1.814, p = .123.
Though MV children's performance in receptive language was better than expressive language (i.e., 3.1 > 2.7), the difference failed to reach significance, t (25) = 1.814, p = .123.
Also, there was a highly significant negative effect of age on MV children's GlAQ (see Table 5 ).