Validation of X-ray fluorescence-measured Swine femur lead against atomic absorption spectrometry.

Environ Health Perspect · 2001 · PMC1240471 · PMID 11712995

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0800

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

of borderline significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

When comparing XRF[Pb] to AAS[Pb], mixed modeling (for which there were no influential observations) showed that both dose and technique were significant factors and that technique x dose was of borderline significance (p = 0.08).

also in 446 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported

When comparing XRF[Pb] to AAS[Pb], mixed modeling (for which there were no influential observations) showed that both dose and technique were significant factors and that technique x dose was of borderline significance (p = 0.08). Again, the marginal significance of tech- nique x dose indicates that the relationships between lead concentration and dose dif- fered for the two techniques: The lines had slopes and intercepts that were significantly different.

also in 1,902 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.