Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Cardioneuroablation for Asystolic Reflex Syncope: How to Identify the Best Candidate and How to Predict Success.

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev · 2025 · PMC12409729 · PMID 40918691

2
hedged sentences
0.1900
closest p · 3.8× alpha
0.1900
boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendp=0.19not close (p > 0.1)
In the PIRECNA registry there was only a nonsignificant trend for better outcome in the group with ablation conducted by an experienced operator [HR 0.52; 95% CI [0.19–1.41]; p=0.19], whereas in the multi-centre study by Aksu et al. there was virtually no difference between procedure-naïve operators and experienced ones. 28 , 62 These results may be explained by the fact that, from a technical point of view, CNA is not a difficult procedure for an operator who is experienced in performing complex ablation procedures, including ablation for AF.

also in 5,406 other papers

borderline significanceno p-value reported
When combined, the use of ECVS seems to be associated with better outcome (91% versus 82% of patients free from syncope recurrence), but with a p-value of a borderline significance.

also in 7,017 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.