Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Assessing Stages of Objective Memory Impairment and neuroimaging as risk factors of incident cognitive impairment.

J Int Neuropsychol Soc · 2025 · PMC12418808 · PMID 40842062

5
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0640
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.001actually significant
Entorhinal thickness was highly significant (HR = 0.57, CI = 0.44 – 0.74, p = 0.001 after correction), representing the strongest biomarker association observed.

also in 82,236 other papers

a trend towards significancep = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
showed a trendp = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Among the FDG-PET biomarkers, entorhinal FDG-PET showed a trend towards significance (HR = 0.62, CI = 0.42 – 0.92, p = 0.055 after correction).

also in 1,624 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.063so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
SOMI-1 and SOMI-2 remained marginally significant ( p = 0.063 for both) after correction.

also in 14,984 other papers

a trend toward significancep = 0.064so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Partial likelihood ratio tests showed that adding PiB-PET did not significantly improve model fit in either analysis (SD = 1: χ 2 = 0.973, p = 0.324; SD = 2: χ 2 = 1.014, p = 0.314), while adding hippocampal volume showed a trend toward significance in the SD = 2 analysis (χ 2 = 3.428, p = 0.064).

also in 2,499 other papers

did not achieve significanceno p-value reported
SOMI-1 showed hazard ratios ranging from 2.97 to 3.95 across models but did not achieve significance after multiple testing correction ( p -values ranging from 0.096 to 0.121 after correction).

also in 809 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.