highly significantp < 0.001
Finally, a third ( Table 8 ) and highly significant model (F(5, 296) = 1604.38, p < 0.001) investigated the relationships between the five subscales of the HPLP II and its total score, explaining 96.4% of the variance.
Finally, a third ( Table 8 ) and highly significant model (F(5, 296) = 1604.38, p < 0.001) investigated the relationships between the five subscales of the HPLP II and its total score, explaining 96.4% of the variance.