marginal significancep = 0.046
A similar trend was observed in the GJH-positive group, although the association reached only marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.967; p = 0.046; Cramer’s V = 0.1), which also represents a small effect size.
A similar trend was observed in the GJH-positive group, although the association reached only marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.967; p = 0.046; Cramer’s V = 0.1), which also represents a small effect size.