extremely significantp < 0.01
It was also 7.2% thicker than “Caddo”, 13.0% thicker than “Nacono”, and 20.35% thicker than “Mandan”, all of which were extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 A).
It was also 7.2% thicker than “Caddo”, 13.0% thicker than “Nacono”, and 20.35% thicker than “Mandan”, all of which were extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 A).