highly significantp < .001
Prediction of CA-MI-R Childhood Trauma The regression model was highly significant, F(22, 17) = 28.21, p < .001, and explained approximately 97.3% of the variance (R 2 = .973; adjusted R 2 = .939).
Prediction of CA-MI-R Childhood Trauma The regression model was highly significant, F(22, 17) = 28.21, p < .001, and explained approximately 97.3% of the variance (R 2 = .973; adjusted R 2 = .939).
No individual predictor reached significance at the 0.05 level; however, the co-use of alcohol and BDZ showed a trend toward significance (β = 73.224, p = .090). 5.
None of the individual predictors reached significance; however, the co-use of alcohol and BDZ showed a trend towards significance with a positive coefficient (β=3.508, t=1.571, p=0.160). 4.