marginally significantp = 0.05
This decline was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in 9/10 of the villages with the highest prevalence in 2011 and was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in the remaining high prevalence village (Table 1 ).
This decline was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in 9/10 of the villages with the highest prevalence in 2011 and was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in the remaining high prevalence village (Table 1 ).
In the case of the CMFL, these declines were highly significant in the five villages with the highest prevalence in 2010/11 (Table 2 ).