highly significantp < .001
ied particularly well, especially after secondary saccades were executed (downward: M = 0.61, SD = 0.06; upward: M = 0.61, SD = 0.08), whereas target motion parallel to the saccade’s direction was classified less accurately in comparison (inward: M = 0.45, SD = 0.07; outward: M = 0.43, SD = 0.10)–a highly significant effect across the sample ( F ( 4 , 36 ) = 27.47 , η 2 = 0.460 , p < .001, p GG <.001).