highly significantp < 0.0001
Figure 10 shows that the control group had a glomerular mesangial mean area of 3219.3 μm 2 , while rats with DN had a mean of 5659.7 μm 2 , which is a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 10 shows that the control group had a glomerular mesangial mean area of 3219.3 μm 2 , while rats with DN had a mean of 5659.7 μm 2 , which is a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001).