borderline significantP = .060
For SUOM, the IVW method supported a causal association (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.07–1.42, P = .004), whereas the MR-Egger estimate was borderline significant (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 0.98–4.96, P = .060).
For SUOM, the IVW method supported a causal association (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.07–1.42, P = .004), whereas the MR-Egger estimate was borderline significant (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 0.98–4.96, P = .060).