highly significantp = 2.7 × 10−14
The difference was highly significant (ANOVA F = 49.74, p = 2.7 × 10−14) and clinically meaningful, reflecting a reduction of nearly three days with earlier NPWT initiation (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).
The difference was highly significant (ANOVA F = 49.74, p = 2.7 × 10−14) and clinically meaningful, reflecting a reduction of nearly three days with earlier NPWT initiation (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).
The association approached but did not reach significance (χ2 = 5.77, df = 2, p = 0.0559; Cramér’s V = 0.277) (Table 5 , Figure 5 ).