highly significantp < .001
In the one-sample test, that large difference in relative male canine size (−1.71 mm) between lineages with a pseudogene and the phylogeny-wide expected value was highly significant ( t = −4.97, df = 10, p < .001).
In the one-sample test, that large difference in relative male canine size (−1.71 mm) between lineages with a pseudogene and the phylogeny-wide expected value was highly significant ( t = −4.97, df = 10, p < .001).