marginally significantP = 2 × 10 −3
For within-EXP group comparisons, the main effect of FREQUENCY was marginally significant for cooperation rate ( P = 2 × 10 −3 , corrected) and significant for cooperation streaks ( P = 1.4 × 10 −3 , corrected).
For within-EXP group comparisons, the main effect of FREQUENCY was marginally significant for cooperation rate ( P = 2 × 10 −3 , corrected) and significant for cooperation streaks ( P = 1.4 × 10 −3 , corrected).
For cooperation streaks, 16 Hz Sync significantly differed from the control ( P = 2 × 10 −3 , corrected), while 16 Hz Rand failed to reach significance ( P = 4.4 × 10 −3 , corrected).