a trend toward significancep = 0.058
In cross‐sectional analyses, this interaction showed a trend toward significance for grip strength and ALM ( p = 0.058 and p = 0.068, respectively), suggesting a possible modifying effect of PGS (Table S7 ).
In cross‐sectional analyses, this interaction showed a trend toward significance for grip strength and ALM ( p = 0.058 and p = 0.068, respectively), suggesting a possible modifying effect of PGS (Table S7 ).
In cross‐sectional analyses, this interaction showed a trend toward significance for grip strength and ALM ( p = 0.058 and p = 0.068, respectively), suggesting a possible modifying effect of PGS (Table S7 ).