borderline significancep = 0.051
3.76 ± 1.36 and p = 0.014) were observed in the ApCR group, with NLR showing borderline significance (2.82 ± 1.30 vs. 2.56 ± 1.41 and p = 0.051) (Table 3 ).
3.76 ± 1.36 and p = 0.014) were observed in the ApCR group, with NLR showing borderline significance (2.82 ± 1.30 vs. 2.56 ± 1.41 and p = 0.051) (Table 3 ).
PR‐negative status showed marginal significance (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40–0.98 and p = 0.053), while complete clinical response remained strongly predictive (reference) versus SD (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02–0.40 and p = 0.002).