marginally significantp = 0.051
Finally, Positive affect was marginally significant (t = 1.90, p = 0.051) with a negligible effect size (d = 0.18) while Negative affect was not significantly different across the two conditions (t = 1.70, p = 0.08).
Finally, Positive affect was marginally significant (t = 1.90, p = 0.051) with a negligible effect size (d = 0.18) while Negative affect was not significantly different across the two conditions (t = 1.70, p = 0.08).