Mailing Vaginal or Urine Self-Sampling Kits versus Conventional Invitation Letters: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Effect on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev · 2025 · PMC12666304 · PMID 40956285

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Previously screened The variation of the self-sampling effect by previous screening history was marginally significant ( P = 0.052), with the strongest effects observed among women screened less than 5 years ago and women without registered screening.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.